Appropriateness of Replacement Milks in South Africa

Published: 

Summary of published paper1

Feeding recommendations for infants of HIV-infected mothers in developing countries remain controversial. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that "when replacement milk is acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable and safe, avoidance of all breast-feeding by HIV-infected mothers is recommended; otherwise, exclusive breastfeeding is recommended during the first months of life". WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF recommend several variations of exclusive breastfeeding and replacement milk for infants of HIV-infected mothers. The replacement milks include commercial infant formula and home-prepared modifications of evaporated milk, powdered full cream milk (PM), and fresh full cream milk (FM).

Little is known about the nutritional adequacy and feasibility of breast milk replacement options recommended by WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF. A recent study set out to explore suitability of the 2001 feeding recommendations for infants of HIV-infected mothers in a rural region of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. The study looked specifically at suitability with respect to adequacy of micronutrients and essential fatty acids, cost, and preparation times of replacement milks.

Nutritional adequacy, cost, and preparation time of home-prepared replacement milks containing powdered full cream milk (PM) and fresh full cream milk (FM) and different micronutrient supplements: (1) 2g UNICEF micronutrient sachet, (2) government supplement routinely available in district public health clinics, and (3) the best available liquid paediatric supplement found in local pharmacies were compared. Costs of locally available ingredients for replacement milk were used to calculate monthly costs for infants aged one, three and six months. Total monthly costs of ingredients of commercial and home-prepared replacement milks were compared with each other and the average monthly income of domestic or shop workers. Time needed to prepare one feed of replacement milk was simulated.

Nutritional adequacy:

When mixed with water, sugar and each micronutrient supplement, PM and FM provided < 50% of estimated required amounts of vitamins E and C, folic acid, iodine and selenium and < 75% for zinc and pantothenic acid. PM and FM made with UNICEF micronutrient sachets provided 30% adequate intake for niacin. FM prepared with any micronutrient supplement provided no more than 32% vitamin D. All PMs provided more than adequate amounts of vitamin D. Compared with the commercial formula, PM and FM provided 8-60% of vitamins A,E and C, folic acid, manganese, zinc, and iodine. Preparations of PM and FM provided 11% minimum recommended linoleic acid and 67% minimum recommended alpha linolenic acid per 450 ml mixture.

Cost and preparation time:

It took 21-25 minutes to optimally prepare 120 mls of replacement feed from PM or commercial infant formula and 30-35 minutes for the fresh milk preparation. PM or FM cost approximately 20% of monthly income averaged over the first six months of life, commercial formula cost approximately 32%.

The main conclusions of the study were that no home prepared replacement milks in South Africa meet all estimated micronutrient and essential fatty acid requirements of infants aged < 6months. Commercial infant formula is the only replacement milk that meets all nutritional needs. Revisions of WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF HIV and infant feeding course replacement milk options are needed. If replacement milks are to provide total nutrition, preparations should include vegetable oils, such as soybean oil, as a source of linoleic and alpha linolenic acids and additional vitamins and minerals.


"when replacement milk is acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable and safe, avoidance of all breast-feeding by HIV-infected mothers is recommended; otherwise, exclusive breastfeeding is recommended during the first months of life".


1Papathakis. P and Rollins. N (2004): Are WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF-recommended replacement milks for infants of HIV-infected mothers appropriate in the South African context? Bulletin of World Health Organisation, March 2004, 82 (3), pp 164-169

Imported from FEX website

Published 

About This Article

Article type: 
Original articles

Download & Citation

Recommended Citation
Citation Tools