Enable low bandwidth mode Disable low bandwidth mode
Field Exchange cover and sneak peak. A man in Kenya holds up a bunch of fish in front of fishing pond

Stunting in the first year of life: Pathway analysis of a birth cohort

Published: 

This is a summary of the following paper: Mwangome M, Ngari M, Brals D et al (2024) Stunting in the first year of life: Pathway analysis of a birth cohort. PLOS Global Public Health, 4, 2, e0002908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002908

Malnutrition among infants aged under six months has often been overlooked, leading to gaps in our understanding of the causes of early infancy stunting. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 conceptual framework for childhood stunting divides contributing factors into three main domains: context (community and societal factors), causes (household and family, feeding, and infection-related factors), and short- and long-term consequences of stunted growth (health, developmental, and economic outcomes). The framework itself does not elucidate potential pathways and relationships between factors that contribute to stunting, limiting application to prioritising and designing interventions.

This study was set up to examine pathways including parental and household characteristics, birth size and gestation, and illness in infancy with stunting at birth and months three, six, and 12 using an a priori hypothesised framework. It was a secondary analysis of a birth cohort of 1,017 infants recruited from four health facilities in Burkina Faso and followed up for one year. 

Among the 1,017 infants included in the study, after excluding perinatal deaths, 522 (51%) were male. The median gestational age was 38.9 weeks (interquartile range: 38.2 to 40.2). Forty-eight (4.7%) infants were born prematurely, and 189 (19%) had low birth weight. Of the 48 infants born prematurely, 34 (71%) also had low birth weight. A total of 454 infants were born in a health facility (45%), while 399 (39%) and 164 (16%) were born at home with and without a community-based assistant present, respectively.

The prevalence of being stunted at birth and at months three, six, and 12 was 7.4%, 23%, 20%, and 18% respectively. The fractions of month 12 stunting attributable to being stunted at birth, month three, and month six were 11% (95% CI 5.0–16%), 32% (95% CI 22–41%), and 40% (95% CI 31–49%) respectively. Modelling showed male sex and maternal characteristics had direct effects on stunting at birth and three months, but not subsequently. Premature birth, twin birth, and being stunted at a previous time point were directly associated with stunting at months three, six, and 12. Both maternal and paternal characteristics were directly associated with preterm birth. Non-exclusive breastfeeding had a borderline positive direct effect on stunting at month six but not at month 12. 

The study's limitations lie in its reliance on an older dataset from an untreated birth cohort, which makes replication challenging. Changes in healthcare services since 2004 may have influenced associations. Estimating gestational age using less accurate methods and the lack of variables such as maternal mental health status are among the limitations. Future studies, through treated cohorts, should encompass all factors in the WHO framework for childhood stunting and additional items identified here for a comprehensive pathway view.

Through this review, the authors uncover complex connections among child, maternal, paternal, and household characteristics. To improve birth size, it is crucial to focus on improving women's nutritional status before conception and during the first trimester of pregnancy, improving socioeconomic conditions, and promoting exclusive breastfeeding. By analysing pathways, we can better understand the shared and distinct links between wasting, stunting, and underweight, fostering collaboration across communities of practice to develop more unified strategies.

Published 

About This Article

Article type: 
Research snapshots

Download & Citation